Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Chile!

This year, we were lucky enough to witness one of the most technologically revolutionary events of our time: the Chilean rescue mission. 

Earlier this year,  33 Chilean miners were trapped 200 meters under the ground for what started as a few days and lasted 2 months. What was fascinating about the issue wasn't just the strength and bond that formed between the miners while underground, as well as the amazing spirit of the Chileans in supporting their miners, but the technology that brought it all together. 

The miners were provided with internet connections to allow them to Skype with their families as well as psychologists. They were provided with phones and cameras to document their time underground. The ability to speak to others above the ground provided sanity and comfort for the miners. What's more, we were able to see and hear everything they went through underground until the moment they were rescued. 


For those that watched the rescue mission, as I religiously did, Twitter and Facebook were two of the best sources for updates. The majority of news sources utilized Twitter to notify followers every time a miner was rescued, so information updates were never out of reach. 

New media platforms revolutionized a tragedy. Technology gave the miners a chance to connect with the outside world and maintain their sanity.

Facebook vs Twitter Infographic

I found the following Facebook vs Twitter infographic online: 


Interestingly enough, it rates mobile usage of both between at 30 and 37%, which I have a very hard time believing. The majority of Facebook and Twitter users use the social platforms through their smartphones. As a Twitter and Facebook user, I've observed that the majority of status updates are provided with a mobile upload sign. What's more, only 52% of Twitter users update their status a day? The entire concept of Twitter is status updates, which again makes the infographic seem even more questionable.